Honestly, the way people treat old thermal paste drives me nuts
I see techs all the time saying you should always replace the thermal paste on any machine you open, even if it's just for a quick clean. Tbh, that's a huge waste of time and money if the paste is still good. I've pulled apart hundreds of office PCs from the early 2010s, and the factory paste is often still fine after a decade if the system wasn't running hot. I tested this on a batch of 30 Dell Optiplex 9020s from a local school. I cleaned the dust, left the old paste, and ran a stress test. Every single one stayed under 75C. Re-pasting all of them would have added over an hour to the job for zero gain. When do you actually need to replace it? Only if it's dried out, cracked, or the temps are bad. Has anyone else found they're re-pasting way less than the common advice says?