9
A recent inspection taught me the true cost of procedural shortcuts
Last week, during a routine inspection on a regional jet, I found a slight crack in a hydraulic line bracket. The plane was scheduled for a short hop, and my supervisor suggested we could defer it since it wasn't on the critical path. I felt torn between keeping operations smooth and adhering to strict safety protocols. It hit me then that every compromise, no matter how small, chips away at the foundation of trust we build with passengers and crew. For instance, I recalled a case where a similar deferred issue led to a minor leak during flight, causing unnecessary stress and downtime. Now, I always advocate for full compliance, even if it means delaying a departure by a few hours. Has anyone else faced pressure to overlook minor defects, and how do you handle it?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
the_susan20h ago
The NTSB database is full of reports where 'minor' issues were the precursor to major incidents. This pattern repeats in healthcare and construction whenever efficiency gets prioritized over procedure. Holding the line on compliance is frankly the least we owe the people relying on these systems.
3
tessabell18h ago
Seriously? Not every tiny slip-up leads to disaster. Sometimes over-compliance just bogs things down without making anything safer.
7