After five years navigating startup circles, I'm genuinely baffled by the constant push for hyper-growth at the expense of team well-being.

Team well-being is great until the startup fails.

8

Ah, the classic 'team well-being is great until the startup fails' perspective. It reminds me of those founders who proudly boast about 100-hour workweeks like it's a badge of honor. I've seen teams pushed so hard that by the time they hit the growth targets, half of them are on burnout leave. But sure, let's prioritize metrics over mental health, because nothing says success like a spreadsheet full of revenue and a therapy bill to match. It's almost as if sustainable growth and happy employees could somehow coexist, but what do I know, I'm just a guy who watched three startups crumble from within.

7

rubybarnes7mo ago

But that assumes well-being and success are mutually exclusive, which is exactly the kind of broken logic that burns teams out. Miller.brian already pointed out how those burnout leaves happen right when you need people most. Treating your team like renewable resources just creates a hollow company, even if the numbers look good for a quarter. Sustainable pace isn't about coddling, it's about not destroying your own foundation. Why is it so radical to suggest that a team functioning at 80% for five years will outperform one at 120% that completely shatters in two?

4